Thursday, August 27, 2015

Full Metal Jacket: The Culturist Implications

Here is my problem: I am promoting a culturist version of Darwinian literary studies and very few political activists see an urgent and vital connection between Darwinian literary studies and their patriotic cause.  Fortunately, Stanley Kubrick’s powerful Vietnam War film, Full Metal Jacket, makes the connection clear.

Kubrick’s film follows the career of one recruit ‘Joker’ (Matthew Bodine) go from boot camp to the war, wherein he works as a reporter / propagandist for the military newspaper.  In this position, Joker sardonically parodies the war. But, after the Tet offensive, the propaganda chief panics that newsman Walter Cronkite will go say the war is unwinnable.  At this point, the chief stops humoring Joker and sends him into combat.  

We all know how disagreement over the Vietnam War’s meaning tore up the United States.  But, we must also come to see the importance of narrative in current politics.  Black Lives Matter, foreign aid, and the resettling of refugees into the West are justified by a narrative that paints the West as having sins for which to atone.  These would all come to a halt if the publicly largely believed the West were a unique cultural gem that needed protection.

Famously, Full Metal Jacket portrays raw indoctrination in boot camp.  The opening shot shows the recruits getting their heads shaved: their old self is to die, so that they might be reborn.  The drill instructor then proceeds to call them ‘gay,’ ‘ladies,’ and ‘fat bodies,’ while mercilessly running them through drills and routines. This continues until the recruit called ‘fat body’ kills the drill instructor and himself. 

The brutality of the suicide / killing scene makes us recoil at the indoctrination and, by implication, military culture.  But, Full Metal Jacket is just a story.  The narrative argues for implementing a sensitive / coed military culture.  The same narrative currently dominates our schools: We cannot call our students ‘fat bodies.’  But, rather than just blindly absorb the film’s narrative about the horrors of military culture, we must question it. 

Perhaps, gender-segregated schools with public displays of patriotism, corporal punishment and name-calling would make the West stronger.   If the Black Lives Matter kids had such schooling, they might be disciplined pro-West contributors to society who would never dream of shooting police. 

But, my point is not that one form of indoctrination or a particular view of the Vietnam War is appropriate. My point is that narrative has a profound outcome on the policies we have and even the policies of which we can conceive. 

Evolution has geared people to make sense of the world via stories.  Literary studies too often fails to comment on the implied morals and values of stories; it fails to recognize that our high school literature books and the assumptions of the arts have a huge political impact.

Culturist literary critics know that, if we are to save the West, we must – as Full Metal Jacket displays – utilize our Darwinian need for public narrative.  Furthermore, we must be wary of stories that limit the mechanisms we will consider using to inculcate our glorious western narrative.

Saturday, August 8, 2015

Culturist Jack Bucky, Culturist John Press and Audrey Russo, the final cut.

Please enjoy this edited interview by the great and enthusiastic host, Audrey Russo.  Jack Buckby is the other guest.  He has been a culturist leader for years.  He is the communications officer for Liberty Great Britain, who publishes so much of my stuff.   Audrey Russo is an audio warrior! Thanks to her hard work, this show - her show - gets broadcast on 7 or more terrestrial radio stations.

Tuesday, July 21, 2015

Small Vacation, Audrey Russo and Jack Buckby

Culturist Readers,

I just finished a great radio interview with Jack Buckby and Audrey Russo.  It will be available in this space soon.

---      ----     ---

Here are Six Basic Elements of American Multiculturalism (that impinge on elitism) from William Henry's 'In Defense of Elitism.' 

One - The idea that “fair” competition would result in demographically proportional sharing of society’s rewards.  And that any inequality therefore indicates racism.  

Two - The notion of equivalency of cultures.

Three -  Rejection of European heritage (responsible for most advances).

Four - Not believing the need for linguistic standardization (Spanish and black English).

Five - The idea that drugs and gang crime are reasonable responses to a bad situation.

Six - Doing well in school is acting white.

--    ---   ---  

All this to say, sorry that my vacation has limited my article writing as of late. Please enjoy my previous posts.  And, don't worry, the article deluge start again soon!

In the meantime,

Spread the words 'culturism' and 'culturist.'

Blessings to you, the West and our cause,

John Press

Saturday, June 20, 2015

Culturist Policy Article # 8 –Culturist Rights and Human Rights

Culturism (cǔl-chər-ǐz-əm) n. The philosophy, art, and science that values, promotes and protects majority cultures.

Culturist (cǔl-chər-ǐst) n. 1. An advocate of culturism. 2. One who engages in the arts or sciences of managing and protecting majority cultures. 3. Adj. Of or pertaining to culturism, culturists or culturist policy.

--   --    -    --    --    --    --    -
Culturist rights and human rights

Rights are not metaphysical; They come from societies that believe in them and can afford them.  China does not believe in the right to vote.  Africa believes every child has a right to an education, but cannot afford it. 

So called ‘human rights’ are really ‘western rights.’ 

Calling them ‘western rights,’ makes us proud, clarifies why we fight, and reminds us that if the West falls, so-called ‘human rights’ will cease to exist.  Who else will uphold them?

Culturist policy and boat people
Muslim nations don’t take in Christian refugees.  China takes no Muslim refugees.  The West also has culturist rights.

The best way to stop the growing tide of refugees is a zero-tolerance policy.  Not a single boat refugee should step foot on western soil.  They must be preemptively steered to a ‘Muslim world’ member nation.

The term ‘Human rights’ is occasionally a useful propaganda tool for, say, pressuring Iran to change.  But, more often it is used to undermine our sovereignty.  As other regions, the West has culturist rights; we must protect ourselves.

Rather than a ‘global community,’ culturists understand the world is made of competing cultural regions. The Islamic world and China seek to dominate the West.

‘Western rights,’ not ‘human rights,’ must guide our refugee policy.

Culturist Jihad
We should not allow foreign nations to fund ‘Middle Eastern Studies’ programs on our university campuses.  This is enemy indoctrination; it bends students towards sympathy with terrorists, and even a willingness to engage in terrorist acts.

New York City’s 9/11 memorial was build with guidance from ‘Middle Eastern scholars.”[i]   That is why the word “Jihad” does not appear in the memorial.  Our 1400-year defense against Islamic aggression is also not mentioned.

Our memorials must be pro-Western and written by proud western culturists.

Islamic nations are building mosques all across the Western world.  If local communities wish to build mosques, our freedom of religion prohibits western governmental interference. But foreign funding of mosques is culturist jihad.

Our rights are western rights.  Our Constitutions protect our western citizens’ freedom of religion; Our constitutions do not give Saudi Arabia the right to build mosques on our land.

Our not being able to build churches in Saudi Arabia shows that ‘human rights’ do not trump ‘culturist rights.’

Culturist rights and borders
Despite the assertion that ‘no one is illegal,’ if you try crossing China’s border without a passport, you will be incarcerated. We too have a culturist right to have borders. So-called, ‘human rights’ do not nullify our culturist rights.

Western citizenship should only be given to western people.

The United States must halt immigration from Latin America.  Changing our cultural demographics is turning the United States into a linguistically split, second world nation.  Worse yet, Mexico has a history of conflict with, and resentment towards, the United States. 

The western world must wholly reject Islamic immigration.  Again, western policies should work towards that which is good for the West, not ‘humanity.’

Those in our lands illegally should be either forcefully deported or pressured to self-deport via making their finding employment or receiving government aid very difficult.

Ending third – world immigration to the West is not racist, it is culturist.  Cultural diversity is real; cultures compete.  Protecting the West is the best way to protect so-called ‘human rights.’

Global trade
One might argue that free trades’ allowing the West to borrow from China helps the West.  This is dubious.  Trade imbalances give China enormous sway over our politicians and our national security decisions.

If a true win-win trade situation can be identified, we should not fear it.  But, we should not pretend that long-term regional culturist strategic competition does not exist.  We should not sell our ports or mineral rights to foreign nations.

Culturists naturally suspect all organizations and systems that work for ‘humanity.’ 
We must denounce ‘western’ politicians that make trade deals to help ‘the world,’ ‘the global community,’ or ‘humanity’ rather than to benefit the West and its member nations.

Culturist Policy Article # 7 –Culturist Rights and Individual Rights

Culturism (cǔl-chər-ǐz-əm) n. The philosophy, art, and science that values, promotes and protects majority cultures.

Culturist (cǔl-chər-ǐst) n. 1. An advocate of culturism. 2. One who engages in the arts or sciences of managing and protecting majority cultures. 3. Adj. Of or pertaining to culturism, culturists or culturist policy.

--   --    -    --    --    --    --    -
Culturist Rights and Welfare
People whose actions are blatantly irresponsible should lose their welfare benefits.

You have an individual right to make babies with several men; society has a right to not subsidize such irresponsibility.

To those who worry about the children; indiscriminately subsidizing single-parenthood has undermined the African – American family and, ultimately, hurts the poor.

Western governments must stop all subsidies to polygamous families. This practice is anti-western.  Those who engage in such arrangements should be imprisoned.

Fault Free Divorce Laws Should be Reconsidered
Divorce laws should aim at strengthening families.  On the whole, single-parent homes are much worse for children.  Children’s rights contextualize parent’s rights.

Gay Marriage Rights
Individual rights do not automatically trump society’s culturist rights.  Society’s morals, traditions, and marriage rates must have standing. 

While culturists of good will may disagree over gay marriage, none would enter this discussion without considering the potential impact on the health of our culture.

Culturist Rights and Schools
Pregnant teenagers should be excluded from mainstream public secondary schools.  This will teach that actions have consequences.  In the long run, this will reduce teen pregnancy.

Other grievous violations of morals and criminal behavior should also be grounds for expulsion.  Using individual rights to protect anti – social behaviors undermines schools’ culturist mission.

Visibly tattooed teenage students should not be employed in public schools.  Employing them conveys a tacit approval. 

Teaching morality is important to the solvency, and first-world status, of the West.  School policy can and must consider morality.

Culturist Rights and Media
Public airwaves should once again provide a pro-social, non-pornographic space for families. 

Ask absolutists, who denounce all censorship, if they would back sex tapes and snuff films being played on public airwaves at all times of day.  The answer is ‘No.’  

The question is not if we should still have public guidelines, but ‘What kind?’ and ‘How much?’

In the age of the internet having public decency laws does not stop people from accessing any type of information they seek. 

Public censorship creates a safe place for families and sends the message that our society celebrates morals and discourages immorality.

Culturist Rights and Zoning Laws
Strip clubs should be pushed to the periphery of cities. 

Ask absolutists if they would allow strip clubs across the street from children’s schools.  The answer is, ‘No.’ 

So the issue is not if we should have zoning laws, but their content.

Men will still be able to access strip.  But, their partial exile will implicitly convey society’s shaming of such behavior.

Culturist Law and Individual Rights
Culturists flatly reject the individual rights argument that society has no right to judge behaviors. 

Western law-makers have traditionally considered morals in policy making. Western culture, values and solvency have traditionally been our policy guides.

Since only the West promotes individual rights, policy’s taking western solvency into account ultimately strengthens individual rights. 

Individual rights are too often used as a defense of overtly anti-social and destructive activities.  Along side individual rights, culturist rights must once again have legal standing.

Saturday, May 23, 2015

Culturist Policy Article # 6 - Culturist Education Policy

Culturism (cǔl-chər-ǐz-əm) n. The philosophy, art, and science that values, promotes and protects majority cultures.

Culturist (cǔl-chər-ǐst) n. 1. An advocate of culturism. 2. One who engages in the arts or sciences of managing and protecting majority cultures. 3. Adj. Of or pertaining to culturism, culturists or culturist policy.

---     --    --    --    --    --   -- 
Culturist Education Defined
Culturist education is traditional education.  It tells students that the West is the best.  As such, it aims to unify the West via instilling pride.  

Multicultural education teaches an anti-western narrative. As such it seeks to instill anger at the West and foments division.

Multiculturalism and ‘Social Justice’
Multiculturalism is worse than it sounds.  It does not only seek to celebrate cultures.  It includes a nefarious Marxist ‘social justice’ agenda. 

The term “social justice” implies that an injustice has occurred against social groups.  In short, multiculturalism promotes the idea that whites and the West been unjust to ‘people of color.’

Multiculturalism thereby pushes an entire anti-Western narrative wherein it is noble to resent and struggle against western nations.    

Culturist Achievement Gaps
When multiculturalists see educational and economic achievement gaps, they immediately announce that it proves western nations are racist.  They use it to further their anti-western narrative.

Culturists take cultural diversity seriously.  Culturists know that achievement gaps show that some cultures value education more than others.  Rather than showing that the West is racist, achievement gaps show that cultural diversity is real.

Culturist educators would ask ethnic groups to use their shortcomings to reflect on the cost of their values and behaviors.

Multiculturalism and Cultural Relativity
Multiculturalism is subtly destructive by announcing that all cultures are equally worthy of praise. Its celebrating all cultures implies that western culture has no particular merit. 

Via Socrates and Jesus, the West invented valuing the individual.  This history allowed the West to invent democracy and free inquiry.  Western culture’s resulting social structures and technology have built the entire modern world.

Mexico has invented nothing. Islam suppresses free speech.  Multiculturalisms’ refusal to make cultural judgment undermines pride in the West.

Culturism and History
Shakespeare is a British historical hero.  Christianity is the West’s traditional majority religion. Opera is a traditional western art form.  We have our own legal tradition based on western values.  Islam is the West’s traditional enemy. 

History upholds the culturist supposition that the West and its constituent nations have traditional majority cultures.  Multiculturalists assertion that the West has always been made up of random international cultures can only be upheld by falsifying history.

Culturism, Education and Morals
Culturist education provides students the goal of perpetuating the western world and western nations.  As such, culturist education provides a moral system.  If you fail in school, you are letting down our heroic western ancestors as well as future generations.

When educators stress education’s impact on individual students’ employment future, they imply that studying only impacts their lives.  This leaves students disconnected and with scant moral guidance.  Perpetuating the nation our heroes bequeathed to us is a duty.

Culturist Education and Assimilation
When multiculturalists have us celebrate ‘Filipino Pride’ week (and such), they permanently divide us.  Thus they deny the possibility of assimilation. As such, multiculturalists are racists. 

The inherent dangers of racist division are the reason that no non-western region of the world works towards diversity or has adopted multicultural education.

Public Culturist Education
Education does not stop at the schoolhouse gate. Culturist education includes public events wherein the west and its holidays are celebrated.  It includes having national flags flown high and anthems sung at public events. 

For the reasons mentioned above, our governments should neither recognize Muslim holidays nor fund festivals celebrating non-western cultures.

Stopping Islamic immigration will also teach the public that the West has a culture, it is endangered, and that we have a duty to act in ways that support its survival.

Culturist Education and Psychology
Humans are social animals; It feels good to belong. When we teach that the West is great, students will feel group pride. When we fail to provide group pride, gangs and foreign religions fill the void.

Multiculturalists seek to instill pride by having students strike a blow against the West in the name of ‘social justice.’  This multicultural narrative, when combined with the natural need for group pride, facilitates ISIS’s recruitment in the West. 

Group pride happens naturally; Public schools are modern societies’ way of guiding this process.  Like all other civilizations, if the West is to survive, we need our schools to be culturist.

Friday, May 15, 2015

Culturist Policy Article # 5 - Culturist Profiling

Culturism (cǔl-chər-ǐz-əm) n. The philosophy, art, and science that values, promotes and protects majority cultures.

Culturist (cǔl-chər-ǐst) n. 1. An advocate of culturism. 2. One who engages in the arts or sciences of managing and protecting majority cultures. 3. Adj. Of or pertaining to culturism, culturists or culturist policy.

--   --    -    --    --    --    --    -
What we call ‘racial profiling’ is usually ‘culturist profiling.’  The word ‘racist’ prevents us from implement policies that could literally save our lives.  Racism is problematic.  But statistics show cultural diversity is real.  To safeguard ourselves, we must implement ‘culturist profiling policies.’

---     --    --    --    --    --   -- 

Culturist profiling the airport:
Nothing better illustrates the disaster of confusing racial and culturist profiling than airport security.  To avoid ‘racism,’ we thoroughly screen all people boarding airplanes and randomly choose whom to give extra scrutiny.  This lengthens our lines and endangers our lives.

Racism is a very poor indicator of terrorist tendencies.  Mexicans and Middle Easterners are both brown.  I am only aware of one Latino terrorist, Edwin Padilla.  And, he did not terrorize in the name of Brown people; He did so in the name of Islam.  Skin tone, again, is a poor predictor of terrorist tendencies.

Being Muslim, male, named Muhammad and traveling back and forth from a Muslim nation are excellent predictors of a terrorism risk. There have been over 25,000 terrorist acts carried out by Muslims since 9/11. People that fit this culturist profile must have extra scrutiny every time they fly.  This is not irrational racism, it is rational culturism.

Ironically, multiculturalists would literally rather you die in a fiery terrorist act than admit that cultural diversity is real.  They consider all assertions that cultural diversity exists the height of irrationality and pure racism.  We cannot be cowed.  Rational culturist profiling at airports is a matter of life and death.

Culturist profiling in employment:
Muslims should not be hired as baggage handlers at airports, work in nuclear power plants or hold government positions related to national security.  Why not?  See the discussion above.

Limits to culturist profiling:
Honest Muslims will understand the rationale behind receiving extra scrutiny at airports.  They will understand why their being employed at nuclear power plants poses a threat to their safety and to the Western public at large. Culturism aims to unify our population. Irrational, unreasonable scrutiny will create resentment and alienation.

If a Muslim works in an innocuous place, say a software company, bank or shoe store, if they do not attend services at a radical mosque, their privacy should be respected.  Such a policy will save our resources and will not generate ill feelings.

Profiling at Mosques:
Mosques should be monitored for radical teaching, because many Muslim clerics strongly condone terrorism and other anti-western practices. If the speakers are radical, we should consider repatriation proceedings.  Shy of that, members’ continued attendance or financial support merits scrutiny.  People who attend mosques wherein no radical doctrines are preached, should not be scrutinized.

Culturist profiling of blacks:
Racial profiling got its bad name from the profiling of black Americans. But the police are, largely, not racists, they are culturists.   They know that many black Americans embrace the criminal ‘thug life’ culture. As such, they commit a disproportionate amount of the crime in America.  Disproportionate stopping of blacks, is not proof of irrational racism in America, it is proof that cultural diversity exists.

Culturism is scientific.  If at some future date, the black crime rate drops to that of Asians or whites, profiling of black youth should stop.  If Muslims stop committing acts of terrorism for 5 – 10 years, they should no longer be profiled at airports.  And, if there is a rash of elder Asian women committing crimes, they should be profiled.   Culturist profiling should be based on statistics, not stereotypes. 

The term ‘racial profiling’ creates resentment and compromises our safety.  In case above, it compromises black peoples’ safety more than anyone else.  Whereas the term ‘racial profiling’ creates resentment in blacks and shame in the majority white culture; the term ‘culturist profiling’ should give the black community pause to evaluate their cultural practices. 

Action plan:
When we call disproportionate arrests of black people ‘racist,’ when we call extra scrutiny of Muslims at airports ‘racist,’ we deny that cultural diversity is real. Worse yet, we put our lives at risk.  All sane people, (even multiculturalists), shown statistics, can admit that cultural diversity is real.  Our security policies must take such diversity into account.

The first step in getting such sane culturist policies in place is to change our language.  We should not speak of ‘racial profiling,’ we must speak of ‘culturist profiling.’  We are not talking about irrational racism, we are advocating statistic-based rational culturism.

Saturday, April 25, 2015

Culturist Policy Article # 4 – Repatriation

Culturism (cǔl-chər-ǐz-əm) n. The philosophy, art, and science that values, promotes and protects majority cultures.

Culturist (cǔl-chər-ǐst) n. 1. An advocate of culturism. 2. One who engages in the arts or sciences of managing and protecting majority cultures. 3. Adj. Of or pertaining to culturism, culturists or culturist policy.

--   --    -    --    --    --    --    -
There are three approaches to repatriation: racist; ‘absolute culturist,’ and ‘pragmatic culturist.’  This article will completely reject the racist model; explain the problems with the absolute culturist model and promote the pragmatic culturist model.

---     --    --    --    --    --   -- 
Racist repatriation policy:
Racist policy gets mentioned only to highlight its stupidity and vast difference from both forms of culturist repatriation. 

Racists repatriation would remove all non-white people from Western areas.  Such a policy would never be approved via election. And, in a multiethnic nation like the United States, especially given the fact that much of our military and police force are not white, attempts to implement this policy would lead to society collapsing into violence. 

Absolute culturist repatriation policy:
Absolute culturists want the immediate repatriation of all Muslims back to their country of origin.  Note how much subtler this is than racist repatriation.  It does not cast Hindus, Asians, and all Africans into the same net.  It makes subtle distinctions based on history and belief systems: it is culturist, not racist.

The culturist profiling of Muslims is advocated on the basis the belief that Islam is fundamentally incompatible with and even hostile to, western civilization.  From a culturist perspective, this makes sense. However, it suffers from the same potential for civil unrest that the racist position does. 

Furthermore, and importantly, the rule of law is central to the West.  If we violate the rights of citizens, we set a precedent and take actions that intrinsically erode our sense of due process. 

Thus the absolute culturist policy, it seems to me, a road to civil disorder and, on a more philosophical level, immediately undermines the West’s view of itself by violating our laws and due process.

Pragmatic Culturist repatriation policy:
The pragmatic culturist policy relies on several measures aimed at stopping the Islamification of the West, while preserving the rule of law.

First of all, in terms of immigration, both absolute and pragmatic culturists would immediately stop all Islamic immigration to the West.  And, to the extent legally possible, both would deny all pending residence permissions.  Neither of these measures compromises our system of law or rights.  Our Constitution protects our citizens.  If you are a foreigner, we have not compromised any rights to which you were entitled. 

This next measure is tailored to the United States, but pragmatic culturist would hope that a legal version pertains in your western nation. In our naturalization proceedings, the potential new citizen swears, “that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic.” Furthermore, they “absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty.”

Sharia law violates our Constitution.  Having supported ISIS or Al Queda means you backed a foreign state. In other words, persons who have backed these terror groups perjured themselves during their naturalization process. As such, such a person is liable for prosecution. However, in the name of efficiency, simply rendering their naturalization null and void and repatriating them will do. 

Furthermore, if you donated to or actively participated in a mosque that is knowingly pro-Sharia and hostile to the West, your citizenship should be revoked.  If you engaged in any un-western practices such as polygamy, female genital mutilation, attending a Sharia court or defying our government proceedings in the name of Islam (for example, not removing your hijab for identification or demanding our schools are halal) repatriation proceedings must proceed immediately. 

Such a policy would allow us to target Muslims who have no intention of assimilating.  And, unlike the absolute culturist position, this policy recognizes the fact that many Muslims are passive in regards to their religion: they drink, smoke and watch football matches on Friday night. To the extent that these folks do not engage in hostile foreign activities, their rights should be protected. People whose rights are protected will not necessarily become antagonistic to their adopted nation. 

To help ‘secular Muslims’ support the West, as detailed in the culturist assimilation policy article, such secular Muslims would be exposed to our common assimilative pressures such as culturist public schools and events. And, ending the foreign funding of mosques on western soil would undercut our enemy’s culturist efforts to radicalize young Muslims. And, as above, fear of repatriation would keep first generation Muslim immigrants from outwardly advocating western culture be replaced.

One might ask, “If pragmatic culturists believe Muslims can be assimilated, why completely stop Islamic immigration?” First of all, large insular communities retard assimilation.  Small amounts of Muslims, neither replenished nor funded by foreign powers, will disperse. Secondly, we can never discount the possibility that the children of moderate Muslims will be radicalized.  We have a right to put the safety of our western citizens in front of the desires of any foreign population to move west.

With these pragmatic culturist repatriation policies, we can regain cultural control of our nations without compromising our sense of legal due process or fomenting civil unrest.

Sunday, April 19, 2015

Culturist Policy Article # 3 - Assimilation

Culturism (cǔl-chər-ǐz-əm) n. The philosophy, art, and science that values, promotes and protects majority cultures.

Culturist (cǔl-chər-ǐst) n. 1. An advocate of culturism. 2. One who engages in the arts or sciences of managing and protecting majority cultures. 3. Adj. Of or pertaining to culturism, culturists or culturist policy.

--   --   --   --   --   --   --   --  -- 

Culturist assimilation policy in a nutshell:
Whereas multiculturalism emphasizes diversity, and drives us apart, culturism emphasizes our unity.  Multiculturalism says the West has no core cultures into which to assimilate and calls all who promote assimilation ‘racist.’ Culturism affirms that western nations have wonderful core traditional cultures into which to assimilate. 

Immigration limitations:
Latin American and Islamic immigration to the West must stop now. For both groups, this forces a choice: here or there?  Additionally, if foreign peoples are the majority in an area, they will not assimilate to the wider country.  We must not grow already large immigrant communities.  

Possible repatriation:
A later article will detail repatriation policy.  Suffice it here to say that, in America, displays of ‘fealty to foreign potentates’ provide evidence that you perjured yourself during your naturalization proceedings: your adopted citizenship contract is thus null and void.

Criminalize Sharia law in the West:
Culturism affirms that the West has a core culture.  Sharia is not western.  Refusing to show your face during government proceedings and advocating public schools become halal, shows fealty to non-western ideals.  As such, (where legally possible), those advocating sharia law should have their citizenship revoked.

No dual citizenship:
Rather than convenience for individuals, ending dual citizenship is designed to create unity behind our Western nations and values.  It forces a choice of loyalties.

Western schools must teach that the West and western nations are the best.  Multiculturalism says all cultures are equally wonderful; this undermines schools’ ability to inculcate pride in western values and achievements.  We need culturist education.

Western festivals:
Local governments should celebrate western history and holidays.  While not requiring attendance, these celebrations provide an opportunity for new citizens to show public enthusiasm for their adopted nations. 

Conversely, our local and national governments and schools should not fund celebrations of other nations or their cultures.  Multiculturalists believe that Ramadan is just as western as Christmas.  Culturists disagree.  Our governments must not promote foreign cultures.

Flags and anthems and flags and anthems:
Fly a flag in front of your house, in banks and government offices.  Let’s have the anthem before films. Stand when it plays.  Let’s play our national anthems on television and radio.  Those who don’t want to stand should feel uncomfortable.

Monolingual government:
Government transactions must only take happen in the traditional majority language of your nation.  Language is a primary source of unity.  Not providing services in foreign languages forces new citizens to learn the national language: This is an essential part of being a citizen.

Furthermore, conducting government work in foreign languages creates enclaves where only foreigners may be hired.  This creates foreign dominated communities, which leads to enclaves where only foreigners can be elected.  In democracies, such enclaves make passing immigration laws difficult, which undermines national sovereignty. 

Limited travel to foreign nations:
Returning to ‘your country’ should be made difficult.  This goal will work in tandem with ending dual-citizenship to force new citizens to decide if they really want to adopt the receiving western nation as their new homeland. 

Immigrants must know that family reunification can happen by your returning to your country of origin; citizenship does not mean your family can come into ours.  And, adopting a new homeland necessarily entails familial and cultural rupture: forewarned, the immigrant has the burden of choice.

No foreign mosque funding:
In America, existing law allows us to trace and stop foreign enemy funds from entering our nation during wartime. Investment is welcome. But, foreign mosque building is not investment; it is culturist aggression. Foreign-funded mega-mosques discourage assimilation into western Christian culture and must be stopped.

Rights advocates must know that this policy does not prohibit local citizens from building mosques and engaging in their chosen religion.  Also note, that China, Iran, and other nations also have culturist laws.  Our Constitution is not a suicide pact; we can legally define and protect our traditional majority culture.  Our constitutions are ours; they do not provide foreign nations rights in our nations.

No remittances:
Those in the U.S. annually send more money in remittances to other nations than the combined debt of several of our major states.  Doing this while our nation is in debt shows poor citizenship.  If you are here to ‘send money back to your country,’ you need to return to your country. 

Reinstate real citizenship oaths:
Finally, citizenship is a matter of the heart, not paperwork.  If you refuse to consider advocating laws that prioritize your new nation’s safety over your convenience and your group’s self-interest, you are not a citizen in the truest sense of the word.

Therefore, we must affirm the importance and legal standing of loyalty oaths for those seeking to become new citizens.  We must prosecute and expel those who perjured themselves during their naturalization process.

Citizenship means supporting the nation’s traditional majority culture.  People of varied backgrounds can celebrate the greatness of the West and western nations.  Good citizens must enjoy freedoms and not be harassed.  And, in turn they should integrate into the nation. 

But this will only happen if we replace multicultural philosophy and policies with the culturist philosophy and the culturist assimilation policies enumerated herein.