Culturism (cǔl-chər-ǐz-əm)
n. The philosophy, art, and science that values, promotes and protects majority
cultures.
Culturist
(cǔl-chər-ǐst) n. 1. An advocate of
culturism. 2. One who engages in the arts or sciences of managing and
protecting majority cultures. 3. Adj. Of or pertaining to culturism, culturists
or culturist policy.
--
-- - -- -- -- -- -
There are
three approaches to repatriation: racist; ‘absolute culturist,’ and ‘pragmatic
culturist.’ This article will
completely reject the racist model; explain the problems with the absolute
culturist model and promote the pragmatic culturist model.
--- -- -- -- -- -- --
Racist repatriation policy:
Racist policy
gets mentioned only to highlight its stupidity and vast difference from both
forms of culturist repatriation.
Racists
repatriation would remove all non-white people from Western areas. Such a policy would never be approved
via election. And, in a multiethnic nation like the United States, especially
given the fact that much of our military and police force are not white,
attempts to implement this policy would lead to society collapsing into
violence.
Absolute culturist repatriation policy:
Absolute culturists
want the immediate repatriation of all Muslims back to their country of
origin. Note how much subtler this
is than racist repatriation. It
does not cast Hindus, Asians, and all Africans into the same net. It makes subtle distinctions based on
history and belief systems: it is culturist, not racist.
The culturist
profiling of Muslims is advocated on the basis the belief that Islam is
fundamentally incompatible with and even hostile to, western civilization. From a culturist perspective, this makes
sense. However, it suffers from the same potential for civil unrest that the
racist position does.
Furthermore,
and importantly, the rule of law is central to the West. If we violate the rights of citizens,
we set a precedent and take actions that intrinsically erode our sense of due
process.
Thus the
absolute culturist policy, it seems to me, a road to civil disorder and, on a
more philosophical level, immediately undermines the West’s view of itself by
violating our laws and due process.
Pragmatic Culturist repatriation policy:
The pragmatic
culturist policy relies on several measures aimed at stopping the
Islamification of the West, while preserving the rule of law.
First of all,
in terms of immigration, both absolute and pragmatic culturists would
immediately stop all Islamic immigration to the West. And, to the extent legally possible, both would deny all
pending residence permissions.
Neither of these measures compromises our system of law or rights. Our Constitution protects our citizens. If you are a foreigner, we have not
compromised any rights to which you were entitled.
This next
measure is tailored to the United States, but pragmatic culturist would hope
that a legal version pertains in your western nation. In our naturalization
proceedings, the potential new citizen swears, “that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United
States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic.” Furthermore,
they “absolutely and entirely renounce
and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state,
or sovereignty.”
Sharia law
violates our Constitution. Having
supported ISIS or Al Queda means you backed a foreign state. In other words,
persons who have backed these terror groups perjured themselves during their
naturalization process. As such, such a person is liable for prosecution.
However, in the name of efficiency, simply rendering their naturalization null
and void and repatriating them will do.
Furthermore,
if you donated to or actively participated in a mosque that is knowingly
pro-Sharia and hostile to the West, your citizenship should be revoked. If you engaged in any un-western
practices such as polygamy, female genital mutilation, attending a Sharia court
or defying our government proceedings in the name of Islam (for example, not
removing your hijab for identification or demanding our schools are halal)
repatriation proceedings must proceed immediately.
Such a policy
would allow us to target Muslims who have no intention of assimilating. And, unlike the absolute culturist
position, this policy recognizes the fact that many Muslims are passive in
regards to their religion: they drink, smoke and watch football matches on
Friday night. To the extent that these folks do not engage in hostile foreign
activities, their rights should be protected. People whose rights are protected
will not necessarily become antagonistic to their adopted nation.
To help
‘secular Muslims’ support the West, as detailed in the culturist assimilation policy
article, such secular Muslims would be exposed to our common assimilative
pressures such as culturist public schools and events. And, ending the foreign
funding of mosques on western soil would undercut our enemy’s culturist efforts
to radicalize young Muslims. And, as above, fear of repatriation would keep
first generation Muslim immigrants from outwardly advocating western culture be
replaced.
One might
ask, “If pragmatic culturists believe Muslims can be assimilated, why
completely stop Islamic immigration?” First of all, large insular communities
retard assimilation. Small amounts
of Muslims, neither replenished nor funded by foreign powers, will disperse.
Secondly, we can never discount the possibility that the children of moderate
Muslims will be radicalized. We
have a right to put the safety of our western citizens in front of the desires
of any foreign population to move west.
With these
pragmatic culturist repatriation policies, we can regain cultural control of
our nations without compromising our sense of legal due process or fomenting
civil unrest.
