SAYING 'CULTURIST' SAVES LIVES AND CAN HELP SAVE THE WEST!

The San Bernardino jihadi’s neighbors were very suspicious of them.  The Muslims received an unusual number of packages and worked late into the night.  But, their neighbors did not report their suspicions, because people might accuse them of being ‘racist’ or of ‘racial profiling.’[i]  

The Left uses the label ‘racist’ to terrorize people into silence.  This works because they conflate race and culture.  These fascist multiculturalists tell you to ‘celebrate cultural diversity.’  But, as soon as you mention that cultural diversity includes any negative traits, they call you ‘racist.’ 

The term ‘culturist’ exposes their nasty tactics.  The overt reference to ‘culture’ in the word ‘culturist’ makes it clear that we are not discussing race.  Since, ‘multiculturalist’ and their ‘cultural diversity’ slogan acknowledge culture, they cannot refuse to discuss it.  We must force them to stay on the topic of cultural diversity, and its reality, by using the term ‘culturist.’

Remember the slogan, ‘If cultural diversity is real, being culturist makes sense.’

As a culturist, I believe that there is a silent majority who are sick of being told all discussions of culture are racist.  They are sick of being told that criticizing ‘thug life’ is racist. They are tired of being told that all differences in economic and educational achievement are evidence of the West’s racism, rather than evidence of cultural diversity’s impact. Cultural diversity greatly impacts our world.  And, people want to discuss it.

Memes go viral; Terms spread quickly. If one politician or popular pundit used the term ‘culturist’ it could become a common word.  As such it could free westerners to discuss cultural diversity without being called ‘racist.’  Then, rather than begging minority groups to believe we’re not racist, we could attack: “I am discussing culture! Cultural diversity real isn’t it?  So, can I discuss it?”  Denying Islam’s violent misogynist homophobia will be harder when the multicultural left admit cultural diversity is real and can no longer just call us ‘racist.’

Now, I can hear defeatists saying, this won’t stop the Left. But, using the term ‘culturist’ costs us absolutely nothing.  And, it could greatly help us challenge the multicultural establishment and their use of the term ‘racist’ to intimidate critics.  And, as the West is criminalizing criticism of Islam, this is a front line issue.[ii]  Trump’s rise shows that there is a silent majority that wishes to speak.  We must defend them against the charges of ‘racism.’  We have nothing to lose and everything to gain.  Please use the word ‘culturist’ today.

Spread the word ‘culturist’ as if our lives are on the line!  Indeed they are.  If the San Bernadino jihadi’s neighbors had alerted authorities, lives might have been saved.  If we spread the term ‘culturist profiling’ more lives will be saved. But, our civilization is also on the line.

Culturism also challenges multiculturalism by asserting that the West has a traditional majority culture to protect.  In light of politicians’ promoting mass Islamic immigration, being able say we have a culture and it is at odds with Islamic culture is more important than ever. To survive, we must embrace culturism; we must tell multiculturalists that acknowledging cultural diversity is not racist; we must be culturist.

---

[i] De Graff, Mia and Farberov, Snejana, “Neighbors of husband and wife San Bernardino shooters 'noticed them acting suspiciously but did NOT report them for fear of racial profiling,” Mail Online, December 3rd, 2015,

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3344736/Neighbors-Saudi-husband-wife-San-Bernardino-shooters-noticed-acting-suspiciously-did-NOT-report-fear-racial-profiling.html

[ii] “AG Loretta Lynch under fire for vow to prosecute anti-Islamic speech,” Examiner.com, December 5th, 2015,

http://www.examiner.com/article/ag-loretta-lynch-under-fire-for-vow-to-prosecute-anti-islamic-speech

Culturists! Here’s How We Fight the ‘Diversity is Strength’ Slogan!

“Diversity is our strength” is an Orwellian slogan. Just one week after the recent Paris terror attacks, Obama declared, “We can all do our part by upholding the values of tolerance and diversity and equality that help keep America strong.”[i] This slogan is frequently used to argue for accepting refugees.  There are several ways in which culturists can counter this dangerous assertion.

One way to respond to the diversity slogan is sheer outrage!  Are the victims of the Paris attack stronger because of diversity?! Do you really think Paris is stronger because of diversity!?  Terror attacks and the subsequent subway / infrastructure lockdowns make the complete idiocy of the idea that diversity brings strength.  And this justifies our screaming, “By saying diversity is our strength, you’re spitting in the face of terror’s victims!!”

Screaming! Why? Because the shock of being yelled at will create a Pavlovian effect.  If leftists know it might evoke an adrenaline-backed rebuke, they’ll hesitate.  And we need to do this as it is disgusting to say ‘diversity is our strength’ right after a terrorist attack. And, while they might go all ‘Boy George’ on you and start to cry, such disgusting remarks merit yelling.

And, we must yell because saying, “Diversity is our strength,” fundamentally undermines the West. Unlike multiculturalists, culturists say we have a traditional majority culture and a right to protect and promote it. The ‘diversity’ slogan says Muslims are just as western as Christians. It says Arabic speaking Syrians are western too. Our demographics, history and history of culturist immigration policy counter this multicultural lie.[ii]  This slogan endangers us by justifying opening our borders to everyone, including our historic enemies. 

We can calmly refute the diversity lie by attacking logically.  “Diversity in what measure? Is diversity in educational achievement good?  Are we stronger if some people are literate and some are illiterate?  Is diversity in levels of violence good? Do you want some girls to get pregnant as teens and others not? Wouldn’t be better off if we were united against crime and terror?  What measures do you want us to be diverse in?”

While multiculturalists may see these as facetious questions, they are not.  Multiculturalists think diversity only impacts happy things like food, fashion, and festivals. But Black culture celebrates thug-life. Mexicans do not mind teen pregnancy or dropping out of school as much as other groups. Islam supports violence aimed at imposing theocracy.  With statistics and examples, because we assert cultural diversity is real, culturist can always win arguments concerning diversity and strength.

We can also ask, “Why don’t other nations think diversity is strength?”  China is stronger because it is united; China fears division. Saudi Arabia doesn’t let Christians become citizens, because it prizes unity.  Are these nations stupid?  Might it not be true that unity is our strength? Why is the US called the ‘United States of America,’ and not the ‘Diverse States of America’? And, why, multiculturalists, do you only condemn the Western culturists as racist and not those in China or Saudi Arabia?  If it is alright for them to be culturist, why not us?”

Culturists need to start directly confronting this perverse slogan. Why? Diversity kills! It leads to civil unrest and decline.  This undermines rights.  In fact, unity is our strength. Assimilation and national pride lead to unity. Defining ourselves as antagonistic to Islamic values unifies us. We need to stand for something or we’ll fall for anything.  Diversity brings terrorism and fragmentation. Celebrating it is dangerous. Please attack all globalist / multiculturalists who solemnly repeat ‘diversity is our strength.’

---

[i] Press Conference by President Obama, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Nov 22nd,

https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/11/22/remarks-president-obama-press-conference

[ii] Press, John, Our U. S.  Culturist Immigration History https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H2r01jwoSrs

Islam is the Enemy! Not ISIS, not Al-Qaeda

Islam is behind the Paris bombings, the Mali hostage situation, 7/7 in London, and all the other more than 20,000 terrorist attacks since 9/11.  Media must stop saying “ISIS has claimed responsibility,” “The Taliban did it,” or “We’re looking for the ringleader.” When they ask such questions, they back up the multicultural idea that the religion is okay, it’s only a few bad apples that are giving Islam a bad name.  To win this battle, we must identify the enemy properly.  It is Islam!

“But, Culturist John,” you might ask, “You’re not saying all Muslims are terrorists, are you?”  “No.  But, I am a culturist, I believe cultural diversity is real.  And, Muhammed was a warrior. He fought in over 20 battles, established a theocracy and beheaded dissenters. If you follow Muhammed, you’re glorifying an expansionist theocratic killer. You’re part of a religion dedicated to violently taking over the world.”

Multiculturalists deny that Islam is behind all these attacks.  Ironically, multiculturalists tell you that all religions are the same.  They say, “Islam is a religion of peace. We’re only hunting a few groups: ISIS, the Taliban, Al-Quaeda, Lone Wolves. Then all will be peaceful again.”  BS.  If you follow Muhammed, you glorify a theocratic warrior killer! As a culturist I am dedicated to convincing the multicultural West that cultural diversity is real.  Islam as a whole is behind all of these attacks.

Then the Left claims, “Muslim’s attack because of what the West did in Iraq.  It’s because of Israel.”  This also pushes the idea that deep down, Islam only wants peace. So I answer, “Did Mali participate in the Iraq war? Why are Muslims attacking in Thailand?  How about India?  Why are Muslims attacking Muslims?  Why did Islam take Spain in 711? Was that because of Iraq?  Israel?” I’ll answer my own rhetorical questions: Islam’s attacks are not a response to a specific policy.  Starting with Muhammed in 622 A.D., Islam has always sought to impose global theocracy via violence. 

“But not all Muslims are terrorists,” they cry.  Culturists reply, “Many ‘Christians’ never go to church, (which doesn’t take much commitment).  And, not all Muslims are brave enough to go on suicide missions. But to support Jesus is to support a pacifist, who valued individuals. To support Muhammed is to support a killer dedicated to theocracy.  All mosques promote the values of this expansionist theocratic warrior.  They are guilty! Individual Muslims may not be violent.  But, Islam is!”   

As a culturist, my focus is cultural diversity being real. Islam is a violent theocratic religion bent on world domination.  And, to highlight cultural differences, we culturists must denounce the media when they ask, “Who was the ringleader?” or “Was ISIS responsible?” or they say, “We are searching for the suspect in Belgium.” We culturists must shout, “The problem is not Al-Quaeda in Mali or ‘the suspect’ or ‘ISIS’; the problem is Islam!”

US Culturist Immigration History Video

Please learn about the history of our culturist immigration policy.  It helps when Obama tells us 'Who we are." 

My Uncle's Death in the Umpqua Community College Shooting

My uncle, Lawrence Levine, was the professor who was killed in the Umpqua Community College shooting.  His death hurt my family and me immensely.  Resulting questions, relevant to political activists, continue to haunt me.

Normally, I am very politically active here and elsewhere promoting culturism. But, this tragedy hit me so hard that I could not watch the news: seeing the killer’s face threw me into a despair-filled rage. I still have trouble watching the news.

Herein, lays a question for us activists: At what level are we appropriate to the political issues we cover?  When I write about the Islamification of the West, I treat it as a theoretical issue.  To the women raped in Sweden, this is inappropriately sedate.  And, if I boldly announce that we should sink refugees’ ships, this is also too casual.

How do I find the appropriate level of emotional sensitivity in my writing and policies?  This emotional question still makes it hard for me to blithely peruse political sites.

President Obama visited our grieving families.  Knowing me, my family begged me to be polite.  And, I thought this would be hard as I detest Obama’s multicultural - globalist policies as much as anyone.  But, he was personable, comparing his daughters to my nieces, and telling us that Michelle and the American people send their sympathies and care – no politics were mentioned.  

This nice gesture humanized Obama for me.  Now I find it hard to conjure as much vitriol for him as I previously did.  And, I say this knowing he is giving Iran nukes, caused continuing death in Libya, and demolished our borders: all things I hate.

Is there ever a moment wherein tragedy – as in 9/11 – makes us all just Americans, or westerners or – dare I, as a culturist, say it – humans?  When, as with grieving families, should we adopt this frame?  And, when should we just be adversaries?

My uncle Larry loved the river and, as a youth, moved to Oregon to escape civilization’s noise.  His home overlooked the Umpqua river, wherein, via fishing, he became one with nature.  This is not hyperbole.  His writings express just this transcendence.  And, on his rare visits to LA, he longed to return to nature. But, civilization chased my uncle to the banks of the river; he did not escape.

Was my uncle’s retreat from civilization spiritual or illusory? How much of our lives should be spent in political trenches and how much outside?  Where is the balance? If retreating to nature is an escape from politics, might not politics also become an escape from life on its own terms? 

Lastly, the existential questions: Why try?  As I worked my way through my uncle’s many unpublished manuscripts, I found myself repeating, ‘Words cannot save you. We will all die. Why continue writing?’  These questions still haunt me.  Perhaps the answer lays in the answers to my earlier questions. For now, just writing again is healing.

RIP Uncle Larry.  

Why My New Version of ‘Imagine’ Must Crush Lennon’s

I recently recorded a ‘right-wing’ culturist version of JohnLennon’s leftist-anthem, ‘Imagine.” In fact, I have long had a physical revulsion to the destructive platitudes in Lennon’s song.  But, with communists and Muslims attacking, the song is now more dangerous than ever.  My mock version may prove to be the antidote to his cultural virus.  But, if that doesn’t work, we may need to decapitate every zombie who is spreading Lennon’s version.  If we don’t dismantle Lennon’s hymn, it could destroy the West.

Lennon’s anthem asks Western people to imagine there’s ‘no religion’ and ‘no countries:’ A borderless heaven. When we’re being inundated and attacked by Islam at every turn; pretending Islam will just disappear when we all ‘imagine’ it, is suicidal. Rather than imagine there is no religion, we must be aware that one religion, Islam, is coming for your throat!   Lennon admits he’s a dreamer.  We need to wake up and stop sleep-walking towards the cliff that Lennon’s stupefying incantation is sending us towards.

Even the way the hippy prophet uses the word ‘religion’ is dangerous.  Not all ‘religions’ are the same.  He thinks imagining no Christianity is good.  Christianity is the best religion ever.  It teaches the value of the individual, it is the basis of western civilization. Lennon’s religion-equating, ‘brotherhood of man,’ formula is at the root of the multicultural blindness that justifies our letting ‘refugees’ into our nations. Imagine Christianity as the official religion of the West.  Why? Christianity is kind. Cultural diversity is real.  Evil Exists. It is called Islam.

Imagine no possessions?  When Lennon goes into this communist reverie I want to vomit. When I lived in New York, I used to sarcastically imagine all the people living in his exclusive, guarded building, ‘the Dakota.’ When Lennon uses ‘greed’ to explain hunger and inequality, he insinuates that the blame for poor nations’ maladies comes from nations who have possessions - the West.  This means we must let in ‘economic refugees’ because our ‘greed’ caused their poverty.  Bullocks.  Our western cultures produce.  Theirs sucks.  Cultural diversity is real. Their poverty is their fault. We owe them nothing. 

So, imagine a world wherein everyone sings my culturist version of Imagine. It would make the West strong and ready to defend itself.  But, if people persist in spreading Lennon’s commu-tard dream about a borderless, heavenly, homogenous nether-world where Islam leaves us alone and people from backwards cultures get “their fair share” of our civilization, we need to see them for what they are: stupefied, destructive, somnambulist, unthinking, virus-spreading zombies weakening our defenses.  Aim for their heads!

My 'Imagine' is the Antidote to Lennon's Horrible Anthem

Why I Hate Hippies!

I hate hippies.  I would like to see their hair set on fire; give them forehead tattoos reading “die hippie die”; and chain them to basement radiators - making them live on dog food and electric shocks.  And, its not just cause I grew up punk rock.  It’s cause their stupidity is threatening my life.

Hippies never understood that evil exists.  They think everyone will be united by ‘peace and love, Baby.’  This is especially moronic as the hippies – the 1960s generation – were the children of the men who fought Hitler.  Yeah!  Peace and love from the gas chambers.

My favorite punk rock article-cum-book is “The Clash of Civilizations” by Samuel P. Huntington.  Written in 1992, it denied the vision that peace and love would rule the planet after the USSR fell.  It said the Cold War question “Which side are you on?” would be replaced by “Who are you?”

With a grade school insight, Huntington noted that, “Conflict along the fault line between Western and Islamic civilizations has been going on for 1,300 years.” ‘Conflict’ would be a great punk band name. He predicted that, now that the West was receding, this long-standing conflict would heat up again.

As Europe gets invaded by its traditional Muslim enemies, via “refugees,” the damned hippies keep telling us, “No, man, its okay to bring them in.  And, we’ll all just get along and our love chakras will harmonize, cause we’re in the Age of Aquarius.  You know, at heart, everyone just wants to be loved.”

This retarded kumbaya idea is the basic hippie logic behind multiculturalism.  But as a culturist, I know cultural diversity is real. ISIS is real.  Evil exists. So I say “BS!” to puke-inducing hippie platitudes.

Everyone does not just want to be loved. Some want to kill you. Some want to tie you to a radiator in a basement and dismantle you bit by bit.  Well, of course (disclaimer) I don’t condone violence. But, I’d sooner have a hippie feel pain and humiliation, than have him invite his ISIS love pals into my nation and get killed myself.  

Full Metal Jacket: The Culturist Implications

Here is my problem: I am promoting a culturist version of Darwinian literary studies and very few political activists see an urgent and vital connection between Darwinian literary studies and their patriotic cause.  Fortunately, Stanley Kubrick’s powerful Vietnam War film, Full Metal Jacket, makes the connection clear.

Kubrick’s film follows the career of one recruit ‘Joker’ (Matthew Bodine) go from boot camp to the war, wherein he works as a reporter / propagandist for the military newspaper.  In this position, Joker sardonically parodies the war. But, after the Tet offensive, the propaganda chief panics that newsman Walter Cronkite will go say the war is unwinnable.  At this point, the chief stops humoring Joker and sends him into combat.  

We all know how disagreement over the Vietnam War’s meaning tore up the United States.  But, we must also come to see the importance of narrative in current politics.  Black Lives Matter, foreign aid, and the resettling of refugees into the West are justified by a narrative that paints the West as having sins for which to atone.  These would all come to a halt if the publicly largely believed the West were a unique cultural gem that needed protection.

Famously, Full Metal Jacket portrays raw indoctrination in boot camp.  The opening shot shows the recruits getting their heads shaved: their old self is to die, so that they might be reborn.  The drill instructor then proceeds to call them ‘gay,’ ‘ladies,’ and ‘fat bodies,’ while mercilessly running them through drills and routines. This continues until the recruit called ‘fat body’ kills the drill instructor and himself. 

The brutality of the suicide / killing scene makes us recoil at the indoctrination and, by implication, military culture.  But, Full Metal Jacket is just a story.  The narrative argues for implementing a sensitive / coed military culture.  The same narrative currently dominates our schools: We cannot call our students ‘fat bodies.’  But, rather than just blindly absorb the film’s narrative about the horrors of military culture, we must question it. 

Perhaps, gender-segregated schools with public displays of patriotism, corporal punishment and name-calling would make the West stronger.   If the Black Lives Matter kids had such schooling, they might be disciplined pro-West contributors to society who would never dream of shooting police. 

But, my point is not that one form of indoctrination or a particular view of the Vietnam War is appropriate. My point is that narrative has a profound outcome on the policies we have and even the policies of which we can conceive. 

Evolution has geared people to make sense of the world via stories.  Literary studies too often fails to comment on the implied morals and values of stories; it fails to recognize that our high school literature books and the assumptions of the arts have a huge political impact.

Culturist literary critics know that, if we are to save the West, we must – as Full Metal Jacket displays – utilize our Darwinian need for public narrative.  Furthermore, we must be wary of stories that limit the mechanisms we will consider using to inculcate our glorious western narrative.

Culturist Jack Bucky, Culturist John Press and Audrey Russo, the final cut.

Please enjoy this edited interview by the great and enthusiastic host, Audrey Russo.  Jack Buckby is the other guest.  He has been a culturist leader for years.  He is the communications officer for Liberty Great Britain, who publishes so much of my stuff.   Audrey Russo is an audio warrior! Thanks to her hard work, this show - her show - gets broadcast on 7 or more terrestrial radio stations.

Small Vacation, Audrey Russo and Jack Buckby

Culturist Readers,

I just finished a great radio interview with Jack Buckby and Audrey Russo.  It will be available in this space soon.

---      ----     ---

Here are Six Basic Elements of American Multiculturalism (that impinge on elitism) from William Henry's 'In Defense of Elitism.' 

One - The idea that “fair” competition would result in demographically proportional sharing of society’s rewards.  And that any inequality therefore indicates racism.  

Two - The notion of equivalency of cultures.

Three -  Rejection of European heritage (responsible for most advances).

Four - Not believing the need for linguistic standardization (Spanish and black English).

Five - The idea that drugs and gang crime are reasonable responses to a bad situation.

Six - Doing well in school is acting white.

--    ---   ---  

All this to say, sorry that my vacation has limited my article writing as of late. Please enjoy my previous posts.  And, don't worry, the article deluge start again soon!

In the meantime,

Spread the words 'culturism' and 'culturist.'

Blessings to you, the West and our cause,

John Press

Culturist Policy Article # 8 –Culturist Rights and Human Rights

Culturism (cǔl-chər-ǐz-əm) n. The philosophy, art, and science that values, promotes and protects majority cultures.

Culturist (cǔl-chər-ǐst) n. 1. An advocate of culturism. 2. One who engages in the arts or sciences of managing and protecting majority cultures. 3. Adj. Of or pertaining to culturism, culturists or culturist policy.

--   --    -    --    --    --    --    -

Culturist rights and human rights

Rights are not metaphysical; They come from societies that believe in them and can afford them.  China does not believe in the right to vote.  Africa believes every child has a right to an education, but cannot afford it. 

So called ‘human rights’ are really ‘western rights.’ 

Calling them ‘western rights,’ makes us proud, clarifies why we fight, and reminds us that if the West falls, so-called ‘human rights’ will cease to exist.  Who else will uphold them?

Culturist policy and boat people

Muslim nations don’t take in Christian refugees.  China takes no Muslim refugees.  The West also has culturist rights.

The best way to stop the growing tide of refugees is a zero-tolerance policy.  Not a single boat refugee should step foot on western soil.  They must be preemptively steered to a ‘Muslim world’ member nation.

The term ‘Human rights’ is occasionally a useful propaganda tool for, say, pressuring Iran to change.  But, more often it is used to undermine our sovereignty.  As other regions, the West has culturist rights; we must protect ourselves.

Rather than a ‘global community,’ culturists understand the world is made of competing cultural regions. The Islamic world and China seek to dominate the West.

‘Western rights,’ not ‘human rights,’ must guide our refugee policy.

Culturist Jihad

We should not allow foreign nations to fund ‘Middle Eastern Studies’ programs on our university campuses.  This is enemy indoctrination; it bends students towards sympathy with terrorists, and even a willingness to engage in terrorist acts.

New York City’s 9/11 memorial was build with guidance from ‘Middle Eastern scholars.”[i]   That is why the word “Jihad” does not appear in the memorial.  Our 1400-year defense against Islamic aggression is also not mentioned.

Our memorials must be pro-Western and written by proud western culturists.

Islamic nations are building mosques all across the Western world.  If local communities wish to build mosques, our freedom of religion prohibits western governmental interference. But foreign funding of mosques is culturist jihad.

Our rights are western rights.  Our Constitutions protect our western citizens’ freedom of religion; Our constitutions do not give Saudi Arabia the right to build mosques on our land.

Our not being able to build churches in Saudi Arabia shows that ‘human rights’ do not trump ‘culturist rights.’

Culturist rights and borders

Despite the assertion that ‘no one is illegal,’ if you try crossing China’s border without a passport, you will be incarcerated. We too have a culturist right to have borders. So-called, ‘human rights’ do not nullify our culturist rights.

Western citizenship should only be given to western people.

The United States must halt immigration from Latin America.  Changing our cultural demographics is turning the United States into a linguistically split, second world nation.  Worse yet, Mexico has a history of conflict with, and resentment towards, the United States. 

The western world must wholly reject Islamic immigration.  Again, western policies should work towards that which is good for the West, not ‘humanity.’

Those in our lands illegally should be either forcefully deported or pressured to self-deport via making their finding employment or receiving government aid very difficult.

Ending third – world immigration to the West is not racist, it is culturist.  Cultural diversity is real; cultures compete.  Protecting the West is the best way to protect so-called ‘human rights.’

Global trade

One might argue that free trades’ allowing the West to borrow from China helps the West.  This is dubious.  Trade imbalances give China enormous sway over our politicians and our national security decisions.

If a true win-win trade situation can be identified, we should not fear it.  But, we should not pretend that long-term regional culturist strategic competition does not exist.  We should not sell our ports or mineral rights to foreign nations.

Culturists naturally suspect all organizations and systems that work for ‘humanity.’ 

We must denounce ‘western’ politicians that make trade deals to help ‘the world,’ ‘the global community,’ or ‘humanity’ rather than to benefit the West and its member nations.

---

[i] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N6Q9KAbx4Lc

Culturist Policy Article # 7 –Culturist Rights and Individual Rights

Culturism (cǔl-chər-ǐz-əm) n. The philosophy, art, and science that values, promotes and protects majority cultures.

Culturist (cǔl-chər-ǐst) n. 1. An advocate of culturism. 2. One who engages in the arts or sciences of managing and protecting majority cultures. 3. Adj. Of or pertaining to culturism, culturists or culturist policy.

--   --    -    --    --    --    --    -

Culturist Rights and Welfare

People whose actions are blatantly irresponsible should lose their welfare benefits.

You have an individual right to make babies with several men; society has a right to not subsidize such irresponsibility.

To those who worry about the children; indiscriminately subsidizing single-parenthood has undermined the African – American family and, ultimately, hurts the poor.

Western governments must stop all subsidies to polygamous families. This practice is anti-western.  Those who engage in such arrangements should be imprisoned.

Fault Free Divorce Laws Should be Reconsidered

Divorce laws should aim at strengthening families.  On the whole, single-parent homes are much worse for children.  Children’s rights contextualize parent’s rights.

Gay Marriage Rights

Individual rights do not automatically trump society’s culturist rights.  Society’s morals, traditions, and marriage rates must have standing. 

While culturists of good will may disagree over gay marriage, none would enter this discussion without considering the potential impact on the health of our culture.

Culturist Rights and Schools

Pregnant teenagers should be excluded from mainstream public secondary schools.  This will teach that actions have consequences.  In the long run, this will reduce teen pregnancy.

Other grievous violations of morals and criminal behavior should also be grounds for expulsion.  Using individual rights to protect anti – social behaviors undermines schools’ culturist mission.

Visibly tattooed teenage students should not be employed in public schools.  Employing them conveys a tacit approval. 

Teaching morality is important to the solvency, and first-world status, of the West.  School policy can and must consider morality.

Culturist Rights and Media

Public airwaves should once again provide a pro-social, non-pornographic space for families. 

Ask absolutists, who denounce all censorship, if they would back sex tapes and snuff films being played on public airwaves at all times of day.  The answer is ‘No.’  

The question is not if we should still have public guidelines, but ‘What kind?’ and ‘How much?’

In the age of the internet having public decency laws does not stop people from accessing any type of information they seek. 

Public censorship creates a safe place for families and sends the message that our society celebrates morals and discourages immorality.

Culturist Rights and Zoning Laws

Strip clubs should be pushed to the periphery of cities. 

Ask absolutists if they would allow strip clubs across the street from children’s schools.  The answer is, ‘No.’ 

So the issue is not if we should have zoning laws, but their content.

Men will still be able to access strip.  But, their partial exile will implicitly convey society’s shaming of such behavior.

Culturist Law and Individual Rights

Culturists flatly reject the individual rights argument that society has no right to judge behaviors. 

Western law-makers have traditionally considered morals in policy making. Western culture, values and solvency have traditionally been our policy guides.

Since only the West promotes individual rights, policy’s taking western solvency into account ultimately strengthens individual rights. 

Individual rights are too often used as a defense of overtly anti-social and destructive activities.  Along side individual rights, culturist rights must once again have legal standing.

Culturist Policy Article # 6 - Culturist Education Policy

Culturism (cǔl-chər-ǐz-əm) n. The philosophy, art, and science that values, promotes and protects majority cultures.

Culturist (cǔl-chər-ǐst) n. 1. An advocate of culturism. 2. One who engages in the arts or sciences of managing and protecting majority cultures. 3. Adj. Of or pertaining to culturism, culturists or culturist policy.

---     --    --    --    --    --   -- 

Culturist Education Defined

Culturist education is traditional education.  It tells students that the West is the best.  As such, it aims to unify the West via instilling pride.  

Multicultural education teaches an anti-western narrative. As such it seeks to instill anger at the West and foments division.

Multiculturalism and ‘Social Justice’

Multiculturalism is worse than it sounds.  It does not only seek to celebrate cultures.  It includes a nefarious Marxist ‘social justice’ agenda. 

The term “social justice” implies that an injustice has occurred against social groups.  In short, multiculturalism promotes the idea that whites and the West been unjust to ‘people of color.’

Multiculturalism thereby pushes an entire anti-Western narrative wherein it is noble to resent and struggle against western nations.    

Culturist Achievement Gaps

When multiculturalists see educational and economic achievement gaps, they immediately announce that it proves western nations are racist.  They use it to further their anti-western narrative.

Culturists take cultural diversity seriously.  Culturists know that achievement gaps show that some cultures value education more than others.  Rather than showing that the West is racist, achievement gaps show that cultural diversity is real.

Culturist educators would ask ethnic groups to use their shortcomings to reflect on the cost of their values and behaviors.

Multiculturalism and Cultural Relativity

Multiculturalism is subtly destructive by announcing that all cultures are equally worthy of praise. Its celebrating all cultures implies that western culture has no particular merit. 

Via Socrates and Jesus, the West invented valuing the individual.  This history allowed the West to invent democracy and free inquiry.  Western culture’s resulting social structures and technology have built the entire modern world.

Mexico has invented nothing. Islam suppresses free speech.  Multiculturalisms’ refusal to make cultural judgment undermines pride in the West.

Culturism and History
Shakespeare is a British historical hero.  Christianity is the West’s traditional majority religion. Opera is a traditional western art form.  We have our own legal tradition based on western values.  Islam is the West’s traditional enemy. 

History upholds the culturist supposition that the West and its constituent nations have traditional majority cultures.  Multiculturalists assertion that the West has always been made up of random international cultures can only be upheld by falsifying history.

Culturism, Education and Morals

Culturist education provides students the goal of perpetuating the western world and western nations.  As such, culturist education provides a moral system.  If you fail in school, you are letting down our heroic western ancestors as well as future generations.

When educators stress education’s impact on individual students’ employment future, they imply that studying only impacts their lives.  This leaves students disconnected and with scant moral guidance.  Perpetuating the nation our heroes bequeathed to us is a duty.

Culturist Education and Assimilation

When multiculturalists have us celebrate ‘Filipino Pride’ week (and such), they permanently divide us.  Thus they deny the possibility of assimilation. As such, multiculturalists are racists. 

The inherent dangers of racist division are the reason that no non-western region of the world works towards diversity or has adopted multicultural education.

Public Culturist Education

Education does not stop at the schoolhouse gate. Culturist education includes public events wherein the west and its holidays are celebrated.  It includes having national flags flown high and anthems sung at public events. 

For the reasons mentioned above, our governments should neither recognize Muslim holidays nor fund festivals celebrating non-western cultures.

Stopping Islamic immigration will also teach the public that the West has a culture, it is endangered, and that we have a duty to act in ways that support its survival.

Culturist Education and Psychology

Humans are social animals; It feels good to belong. When we teach that the West is great, students will feel group pride. When we fail to provide group pride, gangs and foreign religions fill the void.

Multiculturalists seek to instill pride by having students strike a blow against the West in the name of ‘social justice.’  This multicultural narrative, when combined with the natural need for group pride, facilitates ISIS’s recruitment in the West. 

Group pride happens naturally; Public schools are modern societies’ way of guiding this process.  Like all other civilizations, if the West is to survive, we need our schools to be culturist.

Culturist Policy Article # 5 - Culturist Profiling

Culturism (cǔl-chər-ǐz-əm) n. The philosophy, art, and science that values, promotes and protects majority cultures.

Culturist (cǔl-chər-ǐst) n. 1. An advocate of culturism. 2. One who engages in the arts or sciences of managing and protecting majority cultures. 3. Adj. Of or pertaining to culturism, culturists or culturist policy.

--   --    -    --    --    --    --    -

What we call ‘racial profiling’ is usually ‘culturist profiling.’  The word ‘racist’ prevents us from implement policies that could literally save our lives.  Racism is problematic.  But statistics show cultural diversity is real.  To safeguard ourselves, we must implement ‘culturist profiling policies.’

---     --    --    --    --    --   -- 

Culturist profiling the airport:

Nothing better illustrates the disaster of confusing racial and culturist profiling than airport security.  To avoid ‘racism,’ we thoroughly screen all people boarding airplanes and randomly choose whom to give extra scrutiny.  This lengthens our lines and endangers our lives.

Racism is a very poor indicator of terrorist tendencies.  Mexicans and Middle Easterners are both brown.  I am only aware of one Latino terrorist, Edwin Padilla.  And, he did not terrorize in the name of Brown people; He did so in the name of Islam.  Skin tone, again, is a poor predictor of terrorist tendencies.

Being Muslim, male, named Muhammad and traveling back and forth from a Muslim nation are excellent predictors of a terrorism risk. There have been over 25,000 terrorist acts carried out by Muslims since 9/11. People that fit this culturist profile must have extra scrutiny every time they fly.  This is not irrational racism, it is rational culturism.

Ironically, multiculturalists would literally rather you die in a fiery terrorist act than admit that cultural diversity is real.  They consider all assertions that cultural diversity exists the height of irrationality and pure racism.  We cannot be cowed.  Rational culturist profiling at airports is a matter of life and death.

Culturist profiling in employment:

Muslims should not be hired as baggage handlers at airports, work in nuclear power plants or hold government positions related to national security.  Why not?  See the discussion above.

Limits to culturist profiling:

Honest Muslims will understand the rationale behind receiving extra scrutiny at airports.  They will understand why their being employed at nuclear power plants poses a threat to their safety and to the Western public at large. Culturism aims to unify our population. Irrational, unreasonable scrutiny will create resentment and alienation.

If a Muslim works in an innocuous place, say a software company, bank or shoe store, if they do not attend services at a radical mosque, their privacy should be respected.  Such a policy will save our resources and will not generate ill feelings.

Profiling at Mosques:

Mosques should be monitored for radical teaching, because many Muslim clerics strongly condone terrorism and other anti-western practices. If the speakers are radical, we should consider repatriation proceedings.  Shy of that, members’ continued attendance or financial support merits scrutiny.  People who attend mosques wherein no radical doctrines are preached, should not be scrutinized.

Culturist profiling of blacks:

Racial profiling got its bad name from the profiling of black Americans. But the police are, largely, not racists, they are culturists.   They know that many black Americans embrace the criminal ‘thug life’ culture. As such, they commit a disproportionate amount of the crime in America.  Disproportionate stopping of blacks, is not proof of irrational racism in America, it is proof that cultural diversity exists.

Culturism is scientific.  If at some future date, the black crime rate drops to that of Asians or whites, profiling of black youth should stop.  If Muslims stop committing acts of terrorism for 5 – 10 years, they should no longer be profiled at airports.  And, if there is a rash of elder Asian women committing crimes, they should be profiled.   Culturist profiling should be based on statistics, not stereotypes. 

The term ‘racial profiling’ creates resentment and compromises our safety.  In case above, it compromises black peoples’ safety more than anyone else.  Whereas the term ‘racial profiling’ creates resentment in blacks and shame in the majority white culture; the term ‘culturist profiling’ should give the black community pause to evaluate their cultural practices. 

Action plan:

When we call disproportionate arrests of black people ‘racist,’ when we call extra scrutiny of Muslims at airports ‘racist,’ we deny that cultural diversity is real. Worse yet, we put our lives at risk.  All sane people, (even multiculturalists), shown statistics, can admit that cultural diversity is real.  Our security policies must take such diversity into account.

The first step in getting such sane culturist policies in place is to change our language.  We should not speak of ‘racial profiling,’ we must speak of ‘culturist profiling.’  We are not talking about irrational racism, we are advocating statistic-based rational culturism.